We can't say anything concrete about how Bill Heffernan voted on requiring Parliamentary approval of military deployments
How Bill Heffernan voted compared to someone who agrees that Australia should not deploy armed forces without the consideration and approval of Parliament
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for requiring Parliamentary approval of military deployments” which Bill Heffernan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bill Heffernan on this policy.
| Division | Bill Heffernan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Sep 2014, 12:52 PM – Senate Defence Legislation Amendment (Parliamentary Approval of Overseas Service) Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for requiring Parliamentary approval of military deployments” which Bill Heffernan could have attended.
| Division | Bill Heffernan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
17th Mar 2015, 3:49 PM – Senate Motions — Troop Deployment to Iraq |
absent | Yes |
19th Mar 2013, 3:42 PM – Senate Motions - Iraq - Independent inquiry |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Bill Heffernan was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.