Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for greater public scrutiny of the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations” which Bill Heffernan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bill Heffernan on this policy.

Division	Bill Heffernan	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for greater public scrutiny of the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations” which Bill Heffernan could have attended.

Division	Bill Heffernan	Supporters vote
13th Oct 2015, 4:02 PM – Senate Motions — Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement	absent	Yes
26th Mar 2015, 1:26 PM – Senate Motions - Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement - Undertake a cost benefit analysis	absent	Yes
11th Feb 2015, 3:50 PM – Senate Motions — Request for more transparency in Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal.	absent	Yes
29th Oct 2014 – Senate Motions - Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement - Give members of Parliament access to the draft text	absent	Yes
23rd Nov 2011 – Senate Motions — Trans-Pacific Partnership	No	Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Bill Heffernan has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.