How Bill Heffernan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase restrictions on the gambling industry in order to address the issue of problem gambling

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing restrictions on gambling” which Bill Heffernan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bill Heffernan on this policy.

Division Bill Heffernan Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing restrictions on gambling” which Bill Heffernan could have attended.

Division Bill Heffernan Supporters vote

22nd Sep 2014, 6:08 PM – Senate Omnibus Repeal Day (Autumn 2014) Bill 2014 - in Committee - Interactive Gambling Act and ACMA

absent No

5th Mar 2014, 12:27 PM – Senate Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2013 — In Committee — Keep schedule 1 (on gambling) unchanged

absent No

9th Feb 2012, 12:55 PM – Senate Documents — Gambling; Order for the Production of Documents

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Bill Heffernan was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.