We can't say anything concrete about how Bill Heffernan voted on net zero emissions by 2050
How Bill Heffernan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should commit to achieving net zero emissions by 2050 as part of Australia's efforts to address climate change
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for net zero emissions by 2050” which Bill Heffernan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bill Heffernan on this policy.
| Division | Bill Heffernan | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for net zero emissions by 2050” which Bill Heffernan could have attended.
| Division | Bill Heffernan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
15th Jul 2014, 9:31 PM – Senate Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2014 and related bills - Second Reading - Protect from climate change |
absent | Yes |
17th Mar 2014, 1:46 PM – Senate Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 and related bills - Second Reading - Protect Australia from climate change |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Bill Heffernan was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.