How Bill Heffernan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should support the Adani Group's plans to build the Carmichael mine in Queensland's Galilee Basin

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Adani's proposed Carmichael coal mine in the Galilee Basin” which Bill Heffernan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bill Heffernan on this policy.

Division Bill Heffernan Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Adani's proposed Carmichael coal mine in the Galilee Basin” which Bill Heffernan could have attended.

Division Bill Heffernan Supporters vote

17th Mar 2016, 12:39 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Support a rapid transition to clean energy

absent No

25th Mar 2015, 5:25 PM – Senate Business - Great Barrier Reef - Galilee Basin

absent No

2nd Mar 2015, 3:43 PM – Senate Motions - Abbot Point Coal Terminal - Transparency

absent No

12th Feb 2015, 12:32 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Review control of Abbot Point coal terminal

absent No

24th Nov 2014, 5:13 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Galilee Basin

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Bill Heffernan was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.