We can't say anything concrete about how Bill Heffernan voted on giving approval for mining in the Liverpool Plains
How Bill Heffernan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should give approval for new mines in the Liverpool Plains, such as the Shenhua Watermark coal mine
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for giving approval for mining in the Liverpool Plains” which Bill Heffernan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bill Heffernan on this policy.
| Division | Bill Heffernan | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for giving approval for mining in the Liverpool Plains” which Bill Heffernan could have attended.
| Division | Bill Heffernan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
10th Nov 2015, 3:55 PM – Senate Business - Coalmining - Oppose Shenhua Watermark coal mine |
absent | No |
3rd Mar 2015 – Senate Motions — Liverpool Plains |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Bill Heffernan was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.