We can't say anything concrete about how Bill Heffernan voted on an Australian Building and Construction Commission (ABCC)
How Bill Heffernan voted compared to someone who agrees that there should be an Australian Building and Construction Commission (ABCC) to monitor workplace relations in the building and construction industry
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for an Australian Building and Construction Commission (ABCC)” which Bill Heffernan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bill Heffernan on this policy.
| Division | Bill Heffernan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
18th Apr 2016, 6:23 PM – Senate Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Bill 2013 [No. 2] and one other - Second Reading - Agree with the bills' main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for an Australian Building and Construction Commission (ABCC)” which Bill Heffernan could have attended.
| Division | Bill Heffernan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th Oct 2011 – Senate Motions - Australian Building and Construction Commission - Support the Commission |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Bill Heffernan was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.