Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting threatened forest and bushland habitats” which Arthur Sinodinos could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Arthur Sinodinos on this policy.

Division	Arthur Sinodinos	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting threatened forest and bushland habitats” which Arthur Sinodinos could have attended.

Division	Arthur Sinodinos	Supporters vote
10th Sep 2019, 4:23 PM – Senate Motions - Endangered Species - Protect	absent	Yes
6th Dec 2018, 12:42 PM – Senate Motions - Halls Island - Make full assessment on World Heritage values	absent	Yes
4th Dec 2018, 4:50 PM – Senate Motions - United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity - Heed recommendations	absent	Yes
14th Feb 2018, 4:22 PM – Senate Motions - Tasmania: Environment - Tarkine	absent	Yes
25th Jun 2013, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area - Prohibit logging	No	Yes
20th Jun 2013, 12:11 PM – Senate Motions - National Parks - Protect	absent	Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Arthur Sinodinos has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.