We can't say anything concrete about how Arthur Sinodinos voted on increasing funding for university education
How Arthur Sinodinos voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase funding for university education
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for university education” which Arthur Sinodinos could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Arthur Sinodinos on this policy.
Division | Arthur Sinodinos | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for university education” which Arthur Sinodinos could have attended.
Division | Arthur Sinodinos | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
17th Oct 2019, 11:31 AM – Senate Emergency Response Fund (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2019 - in Committee - The Education Investment Fund |
absent | No |
15th Sep 2016, 9:16 PM – Senate Budget Savings (Omnibus) Bill 2016 - Second Reading - Higher education funding |
absent | Yes |
16th Jun 2014, 5:49 PM – Senate Motions - Higher Education Funding - Reverse the budget cuts |
No | Yes |
17th Mar 2014, 8:02 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Commonwealth Scholarships Guidelines (Education) 2013, Commonwealth Grant Scheme Guidelines 2012 - Disallowance |
absent | Yes |
20th Nov 2012, 4:14 PM – Senate Motions - University of Western Sydney - Retain current courses and academic staffing resources |
absent | Yes |
28th Feb 2012, 3:45 PM – Senate Motions - Higher Education - Increase base funding |
absent | Yes |
23rd Nov 2011 – Senate Motions - Education Funding - Increase public higher education funding |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Arthur Sinodinos has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.