We can't say anything concrete about how Arthur Sinodinos voted on offshore oil mining
How Arthur Sinodinos voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should support offshore petroleum mining by, for example, granting exploration and drilling licences
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for offshore oil mining” which Arthur Sinodinos could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Arthur Sinodinos on this policy.
| Division | Arthur Sinodinos | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for offshore oil mining” which Arthur Sinodinos could have attended.
| Division | Arthur Sinodinos | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
16th Oct 2019, 4:40 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change, Petroleum Industry - No new coal, oil or gas projects |
No | No |
12th Feb 2019 – Senate Motions - Great Australian Bight - End oil and gas drilling |
absent | No |
25th Jun 2018, 4:11 PM – Senate Motions - Great Australian Bight - World Heritage Listing |
absent | No |
15th Oct 2015, 12:42 PM – Senate Motions - Oil Exploration - Release Environmental Plan |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Arthur Sinodinos has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.