We can't say anything concrete about how Arthur Sinodinos voted on increasing political transparency
How Arthur Sinodinos voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase transparency requirements for political parties (for example, requiring full and prompt disclosure of any political donations on easy-to-search public websites)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which Arthur Sinodinos could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Arthur Sinodinos on this policy.
| Division | Arthur Sinodinos | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which Arthur Sinodinos could have attended.
| Division | Arthur Sinodinos | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
12th Nov 2018, 3:49 PM – Senate Motions - Political Donations - Increase disclosure requirements |
absent | Yes |
16th Aug 2018, 12:06 PM – Senate Motions - Donations to Political Parties - Disclosure |
absent | Yes |
17th Aug 2017, 12:19 PM – Senate Committees - Select Committee into the Political Influence of Donations - Appointment |
No | Yes |
3rd Dec 2013 – Senate Motions - Political Donations - Disclosure and ban on overseas donations |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Arthur Sinodinos has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.