We can't say anything concrete about how Arthur Sinodinos voted on getting rid of Sunday and public holiday penalty rates
How Arthur Sinodinos voted compared to someone who agrees that there should be no penalty rates when employees work on Sundays or public holidays
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for getting rid of Sunday and public holiday penalty rates” which Arthur Sinodinos could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Arthur Sinodinos on this policy.
| Division | Arthur Sinodinos | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Dec 2017, 10:49 AM – Senate Fair Work Amendment (Repeal of 4 Yearly Reviews and Other Measures) Bill 2017 - in Committee - Penalty rates |
absent | No |
30th Mar 2017, 12:50 PM – Senate Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Take-Home Pay) Bill 2017 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for getting rid of Sunday and public holiday penalty rates” which Arthur Sinodinos could have attended.
| Division | Arthur Sinodinos | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Mar 2017, 4:02 PM – Senate Motions - Workplace Relations - Penalty relates |
No | No |
4th Sep 2014, 12:28 PM – Senate Motions - Australian Workforce - Insecure work |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Arthur Sinodinos has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.