How Arthur Sinodinos voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should change section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act so that the words "insult", "offend", "humiliate" are replaced with the word "harass"

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for changing the wording of section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act” which Arthur Sinodinos could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Arthur Sinodinos on this policy.

Division Arthur Sinodinos Supporters vote

30th Mar 2017, 8:45 PM – Senate Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for changing the wording of section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act” which Arthur Sinodinos could have attended.

Division Arthur Sinodinos Supporters vote

21st Mar 2018, 4:20 PM – Senate Motions - International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination - Condemn Turnbull Government

absent No

30th Mar 2017, 10:04 PM – Senate Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 - in Committee - Change 18C wording

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Arthur Sinodinos was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.