We can't say anything concrete about how Zed Seselja voted on a federal inquiry into Queensland government administration
How Zed Seselja voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should establish a Select Committee on Certain Aspects of Queensland Government Administration related to Commonwealth Government Affairs
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a federal inquiry into Queensland government administration” which Zed Seselja could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Zed Seselja on this policy.
| Division | Zed Seselja | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a federal inquiry into Queensland government administration” which Zed Seselja could have attended.
| Division | Zed Seselja | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
30th Sep 2014, 5:25 PM – Senate Committees - Certain Aspects of Queensland Government Administration - Create a select committee |
No | Yes |
23rd Sep 2014, 6:10 PM – Senate Committees - Certain Aspects of Queensland Government Administration - Speed up consideration of motion |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Zed Seselja has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.