![Photo of Zed Seselja](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10822.jpg)
We can't say anything concrete about how Zed Seselja voted on decreasing government funding for private schools
How Zed Seselja voted compared to someone who agrees that private schools (also known as independent or non-government schools) should not receive significant funding from the government
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing government funding for private schools” which Zed Seselja could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Zed Seselja on this policy.
Division | Zed Seselja | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing government funding for private schools” which Zed Seselja could have attended.
Division | Zed Seselja | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
17th Oct 2018, 3:42 PM – Senate Motions - Schools - Fund public schools |
absent | Yes |
13th Feb 2017, 4:24 PM – Senate Motions - Schools - Needs-based funding model |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Zed Seselja was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.