We can't say anything concrete about how Zed Seselja voted on increasing funding for public schools
How Zed Seselja voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase funding for public schools and prioritise their funding over non-government (private) schools
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for public schools” which Zed Seselja could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Zed Seselja on this policy.
| Division | Zed Seselja | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for public schools” which Zed Seselja could have attended.
| Division | Zed Seselja | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
3rd Dec 2019, 4:24 PM – Senate Motions - Schools - Drought |
No | Yes |
31st Jul 2019, 4:22 PM – Senate Motions - Education - Capital works fund for public school |
absent | Yes |
17th Oct 2018, 3:42 PM – Senate Motions - Schools - Fund public schools |
absent | Yes |
13th Feb 2017, 4:24 PM – Senate Motions - Schools - Needs-based funding model |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Zed Seselja has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.