We can't say anything concrete about how Zed Seselja voted on increasing federal government support for childcare
How Zed Seselja voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase financial support for childcare and early childhood eduction by, for example, supporting increased wages for workers and providing grants for not-for-profit community child care initiatives
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing federal government support for childcare” which Zed Seselja could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Zed Seselja on this policy.
| Division | Zed Seselja | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing federal government support for childcare” which Zed Seselja could have attended.
| Division | Zed Seselja | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
12th Feb 2019, 5:59 PM – Senate Motions - In Home Care Program - Emergency relief required |
absent | Yes |
7th Sep 2017, 12:26 PM – Senate Motions - Child Care - Acknowledge work & increase pay |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Zed Seselja has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.