Compare how Zed Seselja and Jacinta Collins voted on drug testing welfare recipients

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for drug testing welfare recipients” which either Zed Seselja or Jacinta Collins could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Zed Seselja and Jacinta Collins on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Zed Seselja	Jacinta Collins	Supporters vote
21st Mar 2018, 11:14 AM – Senate Social Services Legislation Amendment (Welfare Reform) Bill 2017 - in Committee - Agree with bill	absent	No	Yes
7th Dec 2017, 5:59 PM – Senate Social Services Legislation Amendment (Welfare Reform) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea	Yes	No	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for drug testing welfare recipients” which either Zed Seselja or Jacinta Collins could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Zed Seselja	Jacinta Collins	Supporters vote
14th Jun 2017, 4:09 PM – Senate Motions - Budget - Abandon drug testing income support	No	No	No