We can't say anything concrete about how Katy Gallagher voted on restricting foreign ownership
How Katy Gallagher voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should restrict foreign ownership within Australia, particularly where foreign ownership would be against the national interest
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for restricting foreign ownership” which Katy Gallagher could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Katy Gallagher on this policy.
| Division | Katy Gallagher | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for restricting foreign ownership” which Katy Gallagher could have attended.
| Division | Katy Gallagher | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th May 2016, 4:06 PM – Senate Motions - Sugar Industry - Act on Committee recommendations |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Katy Gallagher was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.