We can't say anything concrete about how Katy Gallagher voted on protecting citizens' privacy
How Katy Gallagher voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should respect its citizens' right to privacy and make sure all sensitive information it does have access to (such as medical, census or tax data) is kept secure
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting citizens' privacy” which Katy Gallagher could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Katy Gallagher on this policy.
| Division | Katy Gallagher | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting citizens' privacy” which Katy Gallagher could have attended.
| Division | Katy Gallagher | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
23rd Feb 2021, 7:15 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Privacy concerns |
absent | Yes |
29th Nov 2017, 4:10 PM – Senate Documents - Department of Human Services - Order for the Production of Documents |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Katy Gallagher was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.