Compare how Katy Gallagher and Steph Hodgins-May voted on implementing refugee and protection conventions
Katy Gallagher
Australian Labor Party Senator for ACT since July 2019
Steph Hodgins-May
Australian Greens Senator for Victoria since May 2024
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should implement the international conventions that relate to seeking refuge and protection from torture. These include the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, the Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees and the non-refoulement provisions of the UN Convention Against Torture and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for implementing refugee and protection conventions” which either Katy Gallagher or Steph Hodgins-May could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Katy Gallagher and Steph Hodgins-May on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Katy Gallagher | Steph Hodgins-May | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
16th May 2024, 7:19 PM – Senate Attorney-General's Portfolio Miscellaneous Measures Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Consideration of UN conventions |
No | Yes | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for implementing refugee and protection conventions” which either Katy Gallagher or Steph Hodgins-May could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Katy Gallagher | Steph Hodgins-May | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
9th Sep 2024, 5:33 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Work Health and Safety (Operation Sovereign Borders) Declaration 2024 - Disallowance |
absent | Yes | Yes |
5th Dec 2023, 4:42 PM – Senate Migration Amendment (Bridging Visa Conditions and Other Measures) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - deportation and imprisonment |
No | - | No |
8th Mar 2023, 10:01 AM – Senate Migration Amendment (Evacuation to Safety) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | - | Yes |
17th Jun 2020, 4:13 PM – Senate Motions - Asylum Seekers - Resettlement |
Yes | - | Yes |
20th Jun 2017, 4:05 PM – Senate Motions - Asylum Seekers - Withdraw from Refugee Convention |
No | - | No |
14th Feb 2017, 4:13 PM – Senate Motions - Papua New Guinea: Asylum Seekers - Against forced migration |
No | - | Yes |