We can't say anything concrete about how Kate Lundy voted on increasing the foreign aid budget to 0.7% of Gross National Income
How Kate Lundy voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allocate 0.7% of Gross National Income (GNI) to foreign aid in line with the United Nations' target
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the foreign aid budget to 0.7% of Gross National Income” which Kate Lundy could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kate Lundy on this policy.
| Division | Kate Lundy | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the foreign aid budget to 0.7% of Gross National Income” which Kate Lundy could have attended.
| Division | Kate Lundy | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
14th Mar 2013, 12:17 PM – Senate Motions - International Development Assistance - Increase foreign aid budget to 0.7% of GNI |
absent | Yes |
25th Jun 2012, 3:42 PM – Senate Motions - Foreign Aid Budget - Increase foreign aid budget to 0.7% of GNI |
No | Yes |
14th Oct 2008, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Anti-Poverty Week - Base pension rate + foreign aid budget |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Kate Lundy has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.