We can't say anything concrete about how Kate Lundy voted on increasing beef import standards
How Kate Lundy voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase the standards and assessment processes that protect the public and beef industry from diseases such as mad cow disease
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing beef import standards” which Kate Lundy could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kate Lundy on this policy.
| Division | Kate Lundy | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
15th Mar 2010, 4:38 PM – Senate Food Importation (Bovine Meat Standards) Bill 2010 — Third Reading - Read a third time |
absent | Yes |
15th Mar 2010, 3:51 PM – Senate Food Importation (Bovine Meat Standards) Bill 2010 — Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing beef import standards” which Kate Lundy could have attended.
| Division | Kate Lundy | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Kate Lundy was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.