We can't say anything concrete about how Kate Lundy voted on Adani's proposed Carmichael coal mine in the Galilee Basin
How Kate Lundy voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should support the Adani Group's plans to build the Carmichael mine in Queensland's Galilee Basin
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Adani's proposed Carmichael coal mine in the Galilee Basin” which Kate Lundy could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kate Lundy on this policy.
| Division | Kate Lundy | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Adani's proposed Carmichael coal mine in the Galilee Basin” which Kate Lundy could have attended.
| Division | Kate Lundy | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
2nd Mar 2015, 3:43 PM – Senate Motions - Abbot Point Coal Terminal - Transparency |
absent | No |
12th Feb 2015, 12:32 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Review control of Abbot Point coal terminal |
No | No |
24th Nov 2014, 5:13 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Galilee Basin |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Kate Lundy has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.