We can't say anything concrete about how Kate Lundy voted on a publicly accessible foreign ownership register for agricultural land
How Kate Lundy voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase transparency by creating a Foreign Ownership Register for Agricultural Land that is available for all citizens to access
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a publicly accessible foreign ownership register for agricultural land” which Kate Lundy could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kate Lundy on this policy.
| Division | Kate Lundy | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a publicly accessible foreign ownership register for agricultural land” which Kate Lundy could have attended.
| Division | Kate Lundy | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Nov 2014, 5:06 PM – Senate Motions - Foreign Investment - Limit foreign investment |
absent | Yes |
11th Sep 2012, 3:45 PM – Senate Motions - Cubbie Station - Foreign investment |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Kate Lundy has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.