Compare how Kate Lundy and David Feeney voted on increasing investment in the coal industry

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing investment in the coal industry” which either Kate Lundy or David Feeney could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kate Lundy and David Feeney on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Kate Lundy	David Feeney	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing investment in the coal industry” which either Kate Lundy or David Feeney could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Kate Lundy	David Feeney	Supporters vote
3rd Mar 2015 – Senate Motions — Liverpool Plains	No	-	No
24th Nov 2014, 5:13 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Galilee Basin	absent	-	No
28th Oct 2014, 4:07 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Acknowledge massive economic benefits	absent	-	Yes
15th Mar 2012, 12:12 PM – Senate Motions - Coal - From coal to clean energy market	No	No	No
10th Sep 2009, 9:41 AM – Senate Motions - Coal Exploration and Mining in the Galilee Basin - Concerns	No	No	No
8th Feb 2007, 10:57 AM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Reduce coal exports	No	-	No