We can't say anything concrete about how David Pocock voted on requiring Parliamentary approval of military deployments
How David Pocock voted compared to someone who agrees that Australia should not deploy armed forces without the consideration and approval of Parliament
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for requiring Parliamentary approval of military deployments” which David Pocock could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Pocock on this policy.
| Division | David Pocock | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
29th Mar 2023, 10:40 AM – Senate Defence Amendment (Parliamentary Approval of Overseas Service) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for requiring Parliamentary approval of military deployments” which David Pocock could have attended.
| Division | David Pocock | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case David Pocock was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.