We can't say anything concrete about how David Pocock voted on considering motions on Gaza (2023-24) (procedural)
How David Pocock voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should suspend the usual procedural rules - known as standing orders - that would otherwise prevent our representatives from considering and voting on motions related to the humanitarian disaster in Gaza that began in October 2023 and which is now the subject of an ongoing case in the International Court of Justice (ICJ), in which South Africa is accusing Israel of genocide
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for considering motions on Gaza (2023-24) (procedural)” which David Pocock could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Pocock on this policy.
Division | David Pocock | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for considering motions on Gaza (2023-24) (procedural)” which David Pocock could have attended.
Division | David Pocock | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
18th Sep 2024, 11:09 AM – Senate Motions - Middle East: Casualties - Let a vote take place |
absent | Yes |
13th Aug 2024, 12:22 PM – Senate Motions - Middle East - Let a vote on Palestine take place |
absent | Yes |
18th Mar 2024, 10:42 AM – Senate Motions - Middle East - Let another vote happen |
absent | Yes |
27th Feb 2024, 12:24 PM – Senate Motions - Middle East - Let another vote take place |
absent | Yes |
7th Feb 2024, 9:55 AM – Senate Business - Rearrangement - Suspend the rules for a motion on Gaza |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case David Pocock was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.