We can't say anything concrete about how David Pocock voted on live animal export
How David Pocock voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allow live animal export and place minimal restrictions on it
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for live animal export” which David Pocock could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Pocock on this policy.
| Division | David Pocock | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for live animal export” which David Pocock could have attended.
| Division | David Pocock | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
17th Nov 2023, 3:28 PM – Senate Inspector-General of Live Animal Exports Amendment (Animal Welfare) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Do not prohibit live sheep export |
No | Yes |
7th Sep 2022, 6:43 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Export Control (Animals) Amendment (Northern Hemisphere Summer Prohibition) Rules 2022 - Disallow |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
David Pocock has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.