We can't say anything concrete about how David Pocock voted on banning new thermal coal mines
How David Pocock voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should put a ban on new thermal coal mines opening in Australia
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for banning new thermal coal mines” which David Pocock could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Pocock on this policy.
| Division | David Pocock | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for banning new thermal coal mines” which David Pocock could have attended.
| Division | David Pocock | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
14th Nov 2023, 12:36 PM – Senate Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (Australia's Engagement in the Pacific) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Fossil fuels |
absent | Yes |
8th Sep 2022, 10:00 AM – Senate Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Acknowledge need to end fossil fuels |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
David Pocock has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.