We can't say anything concrete about how Scott Buchholz voted on banning the sale of non-therapeutic vapes
How Scott Buchholz voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should restrict the importation, domestic manufacture, supply, commercial possession and advertisement of non-therapeutic and disposable vaping goods
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for banning the sale of non-therapeutic vapes” which Scott Buchholz could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Scott Buchholz on this policy.
| Division | Scott Buchholz | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
27th Jun 2024, 9:47 AM – Representatives Therapeutic Goods and Other Legislation Amendment (Vaping Reforms) Bill 2024 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with the Senate's amendments |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for banning the sale of non-therapeutic vapes” which Scott Buchholz could have attended.
| Division | Scott Buchholz | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Scott Buchholz was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.