Compare how Scott Buchholz and Malcolm Turnbull voted on increasing funding for road infrastructure

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for road infrastructure” which either Scott Buchholz or Malcolm Turnbull could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Scott Buchholz and Malcolm Turnbull on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Scott Buchholz	Malcolm Turnbull	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for road infrastructure” which either Scott Buchholz or Malcolm Turnbull could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Scott Buchholz	Malcolm Turnbull	Supporters vote
25th Jun 2014, 4:53 PM – Representatives Customs Tariff Amendment (Fuel Indexation) Bill 2014 and related bills - Second Reading - Decline to read a second time	No	No	No
25th Jun 2014 – Representatives Customs Tariff Amendment (Fuel Indexation) Bill 2014 and related bills - Second Reading - Read a second time	Yes	Yes	Yes