Compare how Scott Buchholz and Natasha Griggs voted on increasing consumer protections
Scott Buchholz
Liberal Party Representative for Wright since August 2010
Natasha Griggs
Former Country Liberal Party Representative for Solomon August 2010 – July 2016
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation that increases consumer protections by, for example, encouraging competition
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing consumer protections” which either Scott Buchholz or Natasha Griggs could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Scott Buchholz and Natasha Griggs on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Scott Buchholz | Natasha Griggs | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
15th Nov 2010, 8:05 PM – Representatives Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2010 — Second Reading — Read a second time |
No | No | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing consumer protections” which either Scott Buchholz or Natasha Griggs could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".