Compare how Scott Buchholz and Anika Wells voted on prioritising religious freedom
Scott Buchholz
Liberal Party Representative for Wright since August 2010
Anika Wells
Australian Labor Party Representative for Lilley since May 2019
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should protect religious freedoms over other rights and freedoms (for example, by giving religious organisations the right to discriminate)
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for prioritising religious freedom” which either Scott Buchholz or Anika Wells could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Scott Buchholz and Anika Wells on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Scott Buchholz | Anika Wells | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
9th Feb 2022, 3:53 AM – Representatives Religious Discrimination Bill 2021 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
Yes | absent | Yes |
9th Feb 2022, 2:20 AM – Representatives Religious Discrimination Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Statements of belief |
Yes | No | Yes |
9th Feb 2022, 1:40 AM – Representatives Religious Discrimination Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Statements of belief |
Yes | absent | Yes |
9th Feb 2022, 1:20 AM – Representatives Religious Discrimination Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
Yes | absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for prioritising religious freedom” which either Scott Buchholz or Anika Wells could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Scott Buchholz | Anika Wells | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
9th Feb 2022, 4:41 AM – Representatives Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Agree with amended bill |
No | Yes | No |
9th Feb 2022, 4:32 AM – Representatives Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Students |
No | Yes | No |
9th Feb 2022, 4:24 AM – Representatives Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Students |
Yes | No | Yes |
9th Feb 2022, 4:11 AM – Representatives Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Teachers |
Yes | absent | Yes |
9th Feb 2022, 3:45 AM – Representatives Religious Discrimination Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Aged Care |
Yes | No | Yes |