We can't say anything concrete about how Kelvin Thomson voted on a plebiscite on the carbon pricing mechanism
How Kelvin Thomson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should hold a plebiscite to gauge whether citizens support or oppose introducing a carbon pricing mechanism (also known as a 'carbon tax')
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a plebiscite on the carbon pricing mechanism” which Kelvin Thomson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kelvin Thomson on this policy.
| Division | Kelvin Thomson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
15th Sep 2011 – Representatives Carbon Tax Plebiscite Bill 2011 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a plebiscite on the carbon pricing mechanism” which Kelvin Thomson could have attended.
| Division | Kelvin Thomson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Kelvin Thomson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.