How Llew O'Brien voted compared to someone who believes that the federal govenment should increase transparency in big business (that is, companies with an income equal or more than $100 million/year or, alternatively, $200 million/year) by making certain information public, including their total income and how much tax they paid

Division Llew O'Brien Supporters vote Division outcome

18th Jun 2020, 10:51 AM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (2020 Measures No. 2) Bill 2020 - Consideration of Senate Message - Disagree with Senate amendments

Show detail

The majority voted in favour of disagreeing with Senate amendments, which means that the bill cannot become law.

absent No Passed by a small majority

17th Jun 2020, 4:53 PM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (2020 Measures No. 2) Bill 2020 - Consideration of Senate Message - Disagree with Senate amendments

Show detail

The majority voted in favour of disagreeing with Senate amendments, which means that the bill will go back to the Senate where our senators will decide whether they will insist on their amendments or not.

absent No Passed by a small majority

How "never voted" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Llew O'Brien was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete other than that they have "never voted" on this policy.