Compare how Llew O'Brien and Scott Buchholz voted on net zero emissions by 2050
![Photo of Llew O'Brien](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10892.jpg)
Llew O'Brien
National Party Representative for Wide Bay since July 2016
![Photo of Scott Buchholz](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10752.jpg)
Scott Buchholz
Liberal Party Representative for Wright since August 2010
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should commit to achieving net zero emissions by 2050 as part of Australia's efforts to address climate change
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for net zero emissions by 2050” which either Llew O'Brien or Scott Buchholz could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Llew O'Brien and Scott Buchholz on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Llew O'Brien | Scott Buchholz | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
30th Mar 2023, 3:52 PM – Representatives Safeguard Mechanism (Crediting) Amendment Bill 2023 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with Senate amendments and so pass bill |
No | No | Yes |
27th Mar 2023, 1:23 PM – Representatives Safeguard Mechanism (Crediting) Amendment Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Agree with the bill as amended |
No | No | Yes |
27th Mar 2023, 12:22 PM – Representatives Safeguard Mechanism (Crediting) Amendment Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
No | No | Yes |
4th Aug 2022, 12:33 PM – Representatives Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Agree with the bills |
No | No | Yes |
4th Aug 2022, 9:51 AM – Representatives Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Agree with bills' main idea |
No | No | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for net zero emissions by 2050” which either Llew O'Brien or Scott Buchholz could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Llew O'Brien | Scott Buchholz | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
8th Sep 2022, 4:26 PM – Representatives Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with Senate amendment |
absent | No | Yes |
8th Sep 2022, 4:20 PM – Representatives Climate Change Bill 2022 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with Senate amendments |
absent | No | Yes |