Compare how Llew O'Brien and Emma Husar voted on tighter means testing of family payments

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for tighter means testing of family payments ” which either Llew O'Brien or Emma Husar could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Llew O'Brien and Emma Husar on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Llew O'Brien	Emma Husar	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for tighter means testing of family payments ” which either Llew O'Brien or Emma Husar could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Llew O'Brien	Emma Husar	Supporters vote
29th Mar 2017, 6:01 PM – Representatives Social Services Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 - Consideration in Detail - Agree to the bill	Yes	No	Yes
29th Mar 2017, 5:42 PM – Representatives Social Services Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea	Yes	No	Yes
29th Mar 2017, 5:37 PM – Representatives Social Services Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Don't agree with bill's main idea	No	Yes	No