Compare how Dan Tehan and Scott Buchholz voted on same-sex marriage equality

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for same-sex marriage equality” which either Dan Tehan or Scott Buchholz could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Dan Tehan and Scott Buchholz on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Dan Tehan	Scott Buchholz	Supporters vote
19th Sep 2012, 12:26 PM – Representatives Marriage Amendment Bill 2012 - Second Reading - Read a second time	No	No	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for same-sex marriage equality” which either Dan Tehan or Scott Buchholz could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Dan Tehan	Scott Buchholz	Supporters vote
18th Nov 2010, 10:27 AM – Representatives Motions - Same-Sex Marriage - Agree to motion	No	No	Yes
18th Nov 2010, 10:20 AM – Representatives Motions - Same-Sex Marriage - Insert new words into the motion	No	No	Yes