How Ben Morton voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal govenment should increase transparency in big business (that is, companies with an income equal or more than $100 million/year or, alternatively, $200 million/year) by making certain information public, including their total income and how much tax they paid

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing transparency of big business by making information public” which Ben Morton could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ben Morton on this policy.

Division Ben Morton Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing transparency of big business by making information public” which Ben Morton could have attended.

Division Ben Morton Supporters vote

10th Aug 2021, 5:14 PM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Bill 2021 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree and so pass bill

absent No

17th Mar 2021, 5:42 PM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Continuous disclosure obligations

absent No

18th Jun 2020, 10:51 AM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (2020 Measures No. 2) Bill 2020 - Consideration of Senate Message - Disagree with Senate amendments

absent No

17th Jun 2020, 4:53 PM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (2020 Measures No. 2) Bill 2020 - Consideration of Senate Message - Disagree with Senate amendments

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Ben Morton was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.