We can't say anything concrete about how Steve Irons voted on increasing support for rural and regional Australia
How Steve Irons voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase its funding for initiatives that support rural and regional communities
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing support for rural and regional Australia” which Steve Irons could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Steve Irons on this policy.
| Division | Steve Irons | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing support for rural and regional Australia” which Steve Irons could have attended.
| Division | Steve Irons | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
10th Jun 2020, 7:24 PM – Representatives National Skills Commissioner Bill 2020 - Consideration in Detail - Regional Australia |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Steve Irons was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.