We can't say anything concrete about how Kim Wilkie voted on restricting foreign ownership
How Kim Wilkie voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should restrict foreign ownership within Australia, particularly where foreign ownership would be against the national interest
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for restricting foreign ownership” which Kim Wilkie could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kim Wilkie on this policy.
| Division | Kim Wilkie | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for restricting foreign ownership” which Kim Wilkie could have attended.
| Division | Kim Wilkie | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
18th Oct 2006, 12:09 PM – Representatives Broadcasting Services Amendment (Media Ownership) Bill 2006 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | No |
18th Oct 2006, 11:21 AM – Representatives Broadcasting Services Amendment (Media Ownership) Bill 2006 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Kim Wilkie has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.