How James Stevens voted compared to someone who agrees that the JobKeeper payment, which is part of the federal government's response to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, should be made available to more workers, including casual workers, workers with major charities, working-visa holders who are still in the country, and workers in sectors such as Education, Disability and Local Government
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing access to the JobKeeper Payment” which James Stevens could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of James Stevens on this policy.
|Division||James Stevens||Supporters vote|
|no votes listed|
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing access to the JobKeeper Payment” which James Stevens could have attended.
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case James Stevens was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.