Compare how James Stevens and Pat Conaghan voted on reducing tax concessions for high socio-economic status
James Stevens
Liberal Party Representative for Sturt since May 2019
Pat Conaghan
National Party Representative for Cowper since May 2019
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should reduce tax concessions for high earners and those of high socio-economic status
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reducing tax concessions for high socio-economic status” which either James Stevens or Pat Conaghan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of James Stevens and Pat Conaghan on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | James Stevens | Pat Conaghan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
9th Oct 2024, 4:17 PM – Representatives Superannuation (Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions) Imposition Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with main idea of the bill |
No | No | Yes |
9th Oct 2024, 4:09 PM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions and Other Measures) Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Agree with the bill |
No | No | Yes |
9th Oct 2024, 3:29 PM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions and Other Measures) Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Omit schedules 1-3 |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
16th May 2024, 5:22 PM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions and Other Measures) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
No | No | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reducing tax concessions for high socio-economic status” which either James Stevens or Pat Conaghan could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | James Stevens | Pat Conaghan | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||