Compare how Christopher Pyne and Sarah Henderson voted on a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia” which either Christopher Pyne or Sarah Henderson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Christopher Pyne and Sarah Henderson on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Christopher Pyne	Sarah Henderson	Supporters vote
17th Feb 2021, 9:40 PM – Senate Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Bill 2019 and another - Third Reading - Pass the bills	-	absent	Yes
17th Feb 2021, 7:13 PM – Senate Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Bill 2019 and another - Second Reading - Agree with bills' main idea	-	absent	Yes
27th Nov 2018, 5:23 PM – Representatives Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2018 - Third Reading - Pass the bill	Yes	Yes	Yes
27th Nov 2018, 5:14 PM – Representatives Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea	Yes	Yes	Yes
27th Nov 2018, 5:03 PM – Representatives Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Bill 2018 - Third Reading - Pass the bill	Yes	Yes	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia” which either Christopher Pyne or Sarah Henderson could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Christopher Pyne	Sarah Henderson	Supporters vote
no votes listed