We can't say anything concrete about how Michael Keenan voted on decreasing ABC and SBS funding
How Michael Keenan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should decrease funding for the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) and the Special Broadcasting Service (SBS)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing ABC and SBS funding” which Michael Keenan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michael Keenan on this policy.
| Division | Michael Keenan | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing ABC and SBS funding” which Michael Keenan could have attended.
| Division | Michael Keenan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
26th May 2015, 8:27 PM – Representatives Communications Legislation Amendment (Sbs Advertising Flexibility and Other Measures) Bill 2015 - Second Reading - Agree to bill's main idea |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Michael Keenan has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.