We can't say anything concrete about how Pat Conroy voted on banning pay secrecy clauses
How Pat Conroy voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should ban pay secrecy clauses so that employees can freely discuss and compare their pay with others
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for banning pay secrecy clauses” which Pat Conroy could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Pat Conroy on this policy.
| Division | Pat Conroy | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
10th Nov 2022, 1:02 PM – Representatives Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Bill 2022 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
10th Nov 2022, 12:59 PM – Representatives Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Agree with the amended bill |
absent | Yes |
10th Nov 2022, 9:31 AM – Representatives Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for banning pay secrecy clauses” which Pat Conroy could have attended.
| Division | Pat Conroy | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
22nd Nov 2022, 4:25 PM – Representatives Business - Consideration of Legislation Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Bill 2022 |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Pat Conroy has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.