Compare how Pat Conroy and Dave Sharma voted on a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
Pat Conroy
Australian Labor Party Representative for Shortland since July 2016
Dave Sharma
Liberal Party Senator for NSW since November 2023
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should unify the Federal Circuit Court of Australia and the Family Court of Australia so that they are one court to be known as the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia” which either Pat Conroy or Dave Sharma could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Pat Conroy and Dave Sharma on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia” which either Pat Conroy or Dave Sharma could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Pat Conroy | Dave Sharma | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||