We can't say anything concrete about how Jill Hall voted on increasing funding for university education
How Jill Hall voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase funding for university education
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for university education” which Jill Hall could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jill Hall on this policy.
| Division | Jill Hall | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for university education” which Jill Hall could have attended.
| Division | Jill Hall | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
3rd Dec 2013, 8:16 PM – Representatives Higher Education Support Amendment (Savings and Other Measures) Bill 2013 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
No | No |
20th Jun 2013, 1:31 PM – Representatives Private Members' Business - University Funding - Reverse decision to cut univeristy funding |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Jill Hall has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.