We can't say anything concrete about how Harry Jenkins voted on increasing political transparency
How Harry Jenkins voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase transparency requirements for political parties (for example, requiring full and prompt disclosure of any political donations on easy-to-search public websites)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which Harry Jenkins could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Harry Jenkins on this policy.
| Division | Harry Jenkins | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
17th Nov 2010, 11:44 AM – Representatives Commonwealth Electoral Amendment (Political Donations and Other Measures) Bill 2010 - Second Reading - Agree to the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
16th Mar 2009, 6:27 PM – Representatives Commonwealth Electoral Amendment (Political Donations and Other Measures) Bill 2009 - Second Reading - Agree to the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which Harry Jenkins could have attended.
| Division | Harry Jenkins | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Harry Jenkins was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.